SENSASI: PEMBANTU PEGUAM TIDAK MAHU LAGI BERSEKONGKOL DENGAN ANWAR..APA KES???
Yuktes Akui Tulis Surat Tentang Anwar
KUALA LUMPUR 13 Mac – Ketua Pembangkang Datuk Seri Anwar
Ibrahim menerima tamparan hebat apabila pembantu kepada salah seorang peguam
bela utamanya dalam kes liwat membabitkan Mohd. Saiful Bukhari Azlan menarik
diri daripada pasukan berkenaan.
Yuktes Vijay, 25, turut mendedahkan beberapa ‘cerita
dalaman’ berhubung kes berkenaan menerusi dua pucuk surat terbuka yang boleh
diakses menerusi beberapa laman blog terutama di AIDC
(http://www.anwaraidc.com) dan MyNewsHub.
Yuktes sewaktu dalam pasukan peguam bela Anwar merupakan
pembantu kepada peguam, Sankara Nair dan banyak membuat kerja-kerja
penyelidikan berhubung kes tersebut.
Beliau turut mencabar Anwar menyamannya ekoran pendedahan
melalui surat-surat itu – Utusan
LEPAS BAPA SAIFUL MINTA MAAF, GILIRAN LOYAR ANWAR PULA BUAT
PENDEDAHAN !!
http://medantempurkedah.blogspot.com/2013/03/lepas-bapa-saiful-minta-maaf-giliran.html
Minta maaf Anwar loya anda dah terang dengan jelas isu liwat
II anda..Tak payah duk spin kut lain lagi..
Menarik!!!…Kenyataan oleh bekas peguam yang terbabit di
pihak Anwar Ibrahim dalam Liwat II, Yuktes Vijay yang mendedahkan kisah sebenar
apa yang terjadi (di sebelah pihak pembelaan Anwar) semasa kes dibicarakan…
Selama ini kita tahu bahawa para peguam Melayu/Islam Anwar
Ibrahim melarikan diri daripada membela beliau. Sebab itu semasa Liwat II,
hampir tidak ada langsung peguam Melayu/Islam yang mahu mewakili Anwar Ibrahim.
Mungkin mereka tahu sesuatu yang menyebabkan mereka malas
nak mewakili Anwar.
Takpe…itu kisah lama.
Kali ini, seorang peguam India pula yang nyata sudah bosan
dan jemu serta marah yang teramat dengan perangai Anwar, tampil membuat
pelbagai pendedahan.
Yuktes Vijay adalah peguam yang terbabit secara langsung
dalam Liwat II bagi pihak Anwar Ibrahim.
Yuktes berkerja dengan salah seorang peguam Anwar dan beliau
melakukan semua kerja-kerja penyelidikan dan mencari bahan untuk mempertahankan
Anwar.
Beliau telah menghantar email ke sebuah portal berita
menceritakan rasa bosannya melihat sikap bermuka-muka Anwar dalam isu Liwat II.
Beliau antaranya sangat kecewa kerana Anwar Ibrahim dan
Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) sanggup merendahkan diri ke tahap yang begitu hina
apabila mempergunakan bapa Saiful untuk faedah mereka.
Yuktes memberitahu, ketika perbicaraan, Anwar sebenarnya
gentar untuk memberikan pengakuan dan bersoal-jawab di kandang saksi. Anwar
bimbang dengan soalan-soalan yang mungkin ditanya barisan pendakwaraya.
Dalam email berkenaan, Yuktes turut melontarkan beberapa
persoalan yang menghantui dirinya dan mahukan para penyokong Pakatan Rakyat
bertanya sendiri kepada Anwar untuk mendapatkan jawapan.
Antaranya:
-Mengapa Anwar secara spesifik dan secara peribadi meminta
Ketua Kakitangannya, Ibrahim Yaakob menghantar Saiful ke apartment (di mana
liwat didakwa berlaku) membawa dokumen sedangkan ada kakitangan yang lain untuk
berbuat demikian.
-Bagaimana Saiful tahu kod untuk masuk ke apartmen itu
adalah Mokhtar, yakni nama Ketua Keselamatan dan adik ipar Anwar?
-Bukti video yang dihantar ke Makmal Ghandi di New Delhi
mengesahkan kehadiran Saiful di apartmen berkenaan, jadi bagaimana kehadiran
Saiful di sana boleh dipersoalkan?
-Mengapa Saiful diberikan layanan istimewa seperti bilik
sendiri, keistimewaan untuk mengikuti Anwar dalam lawatan ke luar negara
walaupun Saiful adalah kakitangan baru?
-Pembantu khas Anwar kini, Najwan Halimi pernah menghantar
email kepada Anwar memaklumkan kesetiaan dan sayangnya kepada Barisan Nasional
(BN), kenapa Anwar tidak pedulikan hal berkenaan?.
Menyedari Anwar tidak mampu bertahan soalan-soalan bertalu
daripada pihak pendakwaraya, pasukan peguambela memutuskan untuk Anwar agar tidak
memberikan sebarang keterangan atas alasan beliau tidak diberikan perbicaraan
yang adil.
Anwar berjaya dalam menipu (conning, deceiving and cheating)
masyarakat dengan membawa watak yang menyerupai Mandela (Nelson Mandela).
Beliau bukan Mandela, tetapi penipu yang hebat, katanya.
Peguam berkenaan juga mempersoalkan siapa yang membayar satu
jumlah yang sangat besar kepada dua pakar luar negara iaitu Dr Brian Macdonald
dan Dr David Wells yang bercakap bagi pihak Anwar semasa perbicaraan.
Yuktes kata beliau tahu identiti seseorang bergelar Datuk
yang membayar untuk semua perbelanjaan berkenaan yang bukan sedikit jumlahnya
dan Anwar tidak mengeluarkan satu sen pun duit beliau. Yuran guaman juga
dibayar oleh Datuk berkenaan katanya.
Beliau walaupun mengetahui siapa Datuk yang menampung semua
perbelanjaan Anwar, pada peringkat ini memilih untuk merahsiakannya.
“Masalahnya ialah jika PKR boleh melontar soalan seperti
siapa membiyai perbelanjaan perkahwinan anak perempuan Perdana Menteri, mengapa
tidak persoalan dari mana jumlah wang yang besar untuk membayar pakar-pakar
berkenaan datang? Jika seorang bekas banduan yang sekadar Ketua Pembangkang
boleh menggunakan Datuk untuk membayar yuram guamannya, apa salahnya kalau ada
Datuk yang hendak bayar perbelanjaan perkahwinan anak perempuan Perdana
Menteri,” soalnya secara analogi.
Mengenai Saiful
Berkaitan dengan mangsa liwat, Saiful pula, Yuktes tidak
tahu banyak mengenai anak muda berkenaan.
“Satu benda yang boleh saya katakan ialah beliau dinafikan
keadilan akibat Pengawai Penyiasat, Jude Perreira, mengabaikan protokol yang
diberitahu Jabatan Kimia kepada beliau dan kemudian memutuskan untuk buat kerja
ikut gaya sendiri.
“Memang ada DNA Anwar dalam dubur Saiful. Satu-satunya
perkara yang menghalang Hakim daripada mensabitkan Anwar adalah rantaian bukti
berkenaan terputus (akibat sikap bodoh pengawai penyiasat),” katanya.
Peguam berkenaan berulang kali menegaskan bahawa air mani
Anwar ada dalam bubur Saiful namun disebabkan rantaian bukti yang terputus
serta persoalan mengenai intergriti sampel yang diperoleh, bukti kukuh
berkenaan terpaksa diketepikan.
Peguam berkenaan bagaimanapun berjanji akan menulis lebih
lanjut dan lebih menyeluruh mengenai isu penolakan bukti yang kukuh berkenaan
dalam email yang akan datang.
APA YANG MENARIK….PEGUAM ITU MAHUKAN ANWAR MENYAMANNYA ATAS
PENDEDAHAN BERHUBUNG LIWAT II…DIA BERKATA DIA TIDAK SABAR UNTUK BERTEMU ANWAR
DI MAHKAMAH BERHUBUNG ISU INI.
Di bawah adalah kenyataan asal Yuktes yang dikarang dalam
bahasa Inggeris.
LETTER: From Yuktes Vijay, via e-mail
I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR.
I knew from Day 1 that the party was devoid of any integrity but for it to
stoop to this extent is just mind boggling. I was working with one of Anwar’s
long-time lawyers during the whole course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z
of the trial itself.
When I say A-Z, it means from meeting the forensic and DNA
experts to reviewing of the documents to finding case laws for his submissions.
I was involved in everything. I do not wish to mention the name of the lawyer
here as I revere him as my mentor and I do not wish to drag him into this
frustration and anger pouring of mine.
Why Anwar never took the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a fair trial. The
truth is he was never brave enough to take the stand. He was never going to
withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his now ally Datuk
Yusof. If you Pakatanians have doubts, why not ask him these questions and get
valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for it.
Why did Anwar personally and specifically request his Chief
of Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents
when there were other staff there;
How come Saiful was aware of the code to enter the apartment
which was ‘Mokhtar’, the name of Anwar’s security chief and brother-in-law? ;
Video evidence that was sent to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi
confirmed the presence of Saiful in the apartment, so how can Saiful’s presence
in the apartment be refuted;
Why was Saiful afforded special treatment i.e. he was given
his own room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a
new staff;
Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed
Anwar and told him about Saiful’s apparent afflictions to BN. Why was the call
not heeded by Anwar?
Fearing that Anwar will not be able to withstand the
onslaught by the Prosecution, the defence team then decided to ask him not to
take stand uder the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar
excelled in conning, deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela
like persona. He is no Mandela, merely a good con artist.
Fund for the overseas experts
The surprising factor here is why no one has ever questioned
the fees that were involved in paying the forensic experts, Dr Brian Macdonald
and Dr David Wells. Contrary to what the general public have been made to
believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they were here, they
stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number of days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come from? Did Anwar
pay from his own pocket? No, he does not even pay his lawyers. So, he had very
rich Datuks funding him. I do know the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons
known close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions as to the wedding
expenditure of the Prime Minister, why not question where the money to pay
these experts came from? If a former convict and a mere Opposition Leader can
have Datuks funding his legal expences, what is wrong in having Datuks funding
the wedding of the PM’s daughter?
Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful. The only thing I can say is
that the reason he was denied justice is that the Investigating Officer, Jude
Perreira, ignored the protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and decided to do
his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in his rectum. The only
thing that stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the “break in the chain
of evidence”. I will write a full piece on this soon. This drama itself
deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there was evidence of Anwar’s semen in
Saiful’s rectum. However, due to a break in chain of evidence and the question
mark over the integrity of the samples, the evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of corroborating Saiful’s
evidence.
Conclusion for Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using Saiful’s dad to play
up his victim role in order to garner votes. We all know for a fact that since
he got acquitted he has lost that bit of “charm” about him as he has nothing to
yell about anymore. I really hope he sues me so that I can prove in Court what
I have just mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring you. I know your
modus operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the public watch
Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me) in action. And remember the e-mails,
Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get me!
The writer, a former Anwarista, worked in Anwar’s Sodomy 2
trial for the defence – FMT
sumber Mynewshub
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan